The Chickasaw Plum

Home Short Stories Poetry Articles Humor Links

Obama For President

By Sherwood Ross

Of course, when fanatics can’t attack a man for anything he’s actually done that’s downright despicable, they’ll go after him for what he’s said, and if they can’t find anything he’s said that’s awful they’ll go after him for what his friends or associates have said.

Apparently, that’s why Fox News has endlessly replayed those clips of Senator Obama’s pastor saying controversial things. All they can charge Obama with is knowing the man, not exactly a crime yet in America, and the Fox newscasters aren’t the least bit mollified that Obama has repudiated Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s comments. Fox is engaging in the old Joe McCarthy smear tactic of guilt by association. Back in the Fifties, if you happened to ride on the same bus with a Commie, it made you a “fellow traveler.”

By contrast, Fox commentators don’t begin to hold Senator McCain up to the same standard they demand of Obama’s pastor! Bill O’Reilly sees nothing wrong with Senator McCain’s vote to launch an illegal war against Iraq because O’Reilly backed that war, too, and seemingly swallowed the lies Bush told to start it.

No matter if Bush’s war has by now claimed the lives of a million human beings, destroyed much of Iraq, and cost the American people 4,000+ lives, 30,000 wounded, (have you visited a VA hospital lately?) and parted the public from a couple of trillion bucks. As far as Fox News is concerned, it’s okay to vote to make illegal wars and kill innocent people. It’s not okay to have a pastor that condemns wrong wars in an angry tone of voice. That's disgusting.

As this campaign has worn on, I have begun to  suspect that  Obama does not believe in killing innocent people. Recall that Senator Clinton scolded him last year for saying he would not use atomic weapons to go after terrorists. Obama said he wouldn’t do it as nukes might kill civilians.

Since the use of such weapons is prohibited by a treaty the United States has signed, it’s an eminently sensible position. Besides, when you drop an atomic bomb, the fallout spreads and who knows where it might wind up? The Three-Mile Island debacle pales beside the prospect of military use of a nuclear weapon.

But Clinton chided Obama for taking the nuclear “option” off the table when, in fact, no such option exists. Now this is a very real and significant difference between the candidates. As far as I can tell, Obama is the only one of the three sane enough not to claim the right to use banned atomic weapons.

Maybe that’s because, as a constitutional scholar and former University of Chicago law school professor, Obama believes in law and order. The Illinois Fraternal Order of Police thought so when it endorsed him for the Senate in 2004. However, by their votes favoring an illegal war, Senators McCain and Clinton have proved they are no respecters of law and order, no more than is President Bush, no more than Fox News.

Speaking of the law, when you graduate magna cum laude and as president of the Harvard Law Review you can pretty much have your pick of jobs at many a prestigious law firm and earn yourself a bundle. Instead, Obama took a $13,000-a-year job as head of a faith-based community organizing agency funded by the Catholic Church and directed by a church coalition. According to biographers, Obama worked “to counteract the dislocation and massive unemployment caused by the closing and downsizing of southeast Chicago steel plants.”

So I ask you, who would want a man in the White House that actually believes in law and order, refuses to vote for illegal wars or drop atomic bombs, and instead devotes his life to alleviating human suffering in preference to making himself rich? Why would anyone vote for such a guy? Seriously, Obama towers over his opponents in the eyes of Americans who would like to see a humanitarian, not a warmonger, seated in the Oval Office.

(Sherwood Ross is a native Chicagoan formerly active in the civil rights movement in that city and elsewhere. He has worked as a reporter for the Chicago Daily News and wire services. Reach him at sherwoodr1@yahoo.com)

The Chickasaw Plum - Volume V - Number 5 - May 2008

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the above articles are distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. The Chickasaw Plum has no affiliation whatsoever with the originators of these articles nor is it endorsed or sponsored by the originator.

"Go to Original" links are provided where possible as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on the Plum may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.

Home Short Stories Poetry Articles Humor Links